The idea of a formalized project management approach has been with us for quite some time. So it had not been uncommon for virtually any manager to end up learning the self-discipline of a structured project management system. That project methodology takes any offered business or That project through the identical standardized steps coming from conception through implementation.
Those steps would include…
- Project definition
- Requirements analysis and needs definition.
- Cost benefit analysis.
- Project opportunity.
- Project schedule and also budget.
- Detailed specs
- Development
- Testing
- Training
- Deployment
By by using a standardized process of doing all projects exactly the same way, using the exact same reporting methods and tools, there is an economy of expertise in that the particular project leaders as well as team members become adept at directing these steps. Further, by using exactly the same systems and standards, a scale associated with evaluation as for the effectiveness of the system is developed and so the ability of venture teams to excel over time enhances.
It was normal that this standardized method would grow to be codified and ultimately developed into a well-developed system that could that molds almost all projects to an individual standard. By developing an industry extensive method that demands strict training and adherence to the identical terms, tool models and definitions regarding success, the “user-friendly” nature of judgment project effectiveness is actually reduced. And so “the Project Administration Method” was developed whereby project supervisors can undergo physically demanding and exacting lessons in a standardized approach that would become enforced via accreditation across the complete of the businessmen.
Whether or not necessarily the PMM represents a curse or even a blessing to the corporate world depends to a big extent on personal applications of the process and measurements and also observations on whether or not the method itself features efficiency to the operation of project management or perhaps another layer of bureaucracy.
There are a handful of strong positives in order to utilizing a strategy that is standardized at an business level. Those task managers who already went through a the certification procedure can be been dependent on to implement that system the in an identical way in each company setting. As such, the process associated with finding qualified venture managers becomes basic because the qualification process alone communicates to the company that it can get the PMM method to be implemented correctly.
By placing into place another method of accreditation and measurement of excellence, the venture manager career actually starts to take a advanced of professionalism similar to in the lawful and medical fields. So the PMM movement signifies a maturing of the IT and project management disciplines as they will move toward higher levels of responsibility and control.
The risks come in implementation of the PMM methodology on a project by task basis. In purchase for a PMM certified manager to live simply by his credentials, almost all projects must comply with a standard mold. The unique dynamics of each venture may not conveniently be carried into the PMM process regarding systematization.
In addition, the PMM method is heavily dependent on a large amount of meetings to document that the venture is adhering in order to standards and the methodical documentation procedure from which there is certainly little room with regard to variation or accommodation. The PMM can be a complex methodology therefore the tool sets that must be used to observe the process could be expensive and challenging to use.
The end result is that the development of the PMM method can cause the particular business objectives with the project to undertake a secondary concern to the high standards of PMM itself. Task leaders working beneath the requirements of the actual PMM can be accountable to the methodology itself and also lose sight of what is best for the business or perhaps what is effective in terms of getting the project accomplished.
There is almost no room for creativeness or individual view within the boundaries of the PMM and that's problematic because the character of business issues have historically depended on the judgment and creative problem solving abilities of middle supervision. By dominating the particular project process with all the needs of the PMM methodology, excessive cost is launched as well since cumbersome requirements that won't benefit the business or the venture itself.
